K-RERA · the public record
Casa Grande Lorenza
Yelahanka · Casa Grande Garden City Builders
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
Free project details
Registration read 25 Oct 2026Registered units and project size
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
The whole registration
2.4registered acres
65.9registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for Casa Grande Lorenza
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/472/PR/181130/002193
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
In context
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 160 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 12,612 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Registered land area | 9,823 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 1.75 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 1 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 176 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 15-10-2018 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2BHK & 3BHK | 160 | 100% | 12,612 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CASAGRAND LORENZA | 4 | 160 | 176 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 160 official flat/unit rows, matching the 160 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2BHK | 107 | 63.2-71.3 sqm | 49.4-56.1 sqm | 108 |
| 3BHK | 53 | 89.4-109.4 sqm | 68.8-84.6 sqm | 81 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CASAGRAND LORENZA | 160 | 63.2-109.4 sqm | 49.4-84.6 sqm | 189 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AG01 | CASAGRAND LORENZA | 0 | 3BHK | 109.4 sqm | 84.6 sqm | 2 |
| AG02 | CASAGRAND LORENZA | 0 | 3BHK | 103.4 sqm | 79.6 sqm | 2 |
| AG03 | CASAGRAND LORENZA | 0 | 2BHK | 71.0 sqm | 55.5 sqm | 1 |
| AG04 | CASAGRAND LORENZA | 0 | 2BHK | 71.0 sqm | 55.8 sqm | 1 |
| AG05 | CASAGRAND LORENZA | 0 | 2BHK | 66.8 sqm | 52.3 sqm | 1 |
| AG06 | CASAGRAND LORENZA | 0 | 2BHK | 66.8 sqm | 52.0 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
23 of 36 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 13 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 15 Oct 2020, extended (Section 6 Extension) to 15 Jul 2022 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 29 Dec 2021 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/472/PR/211229/002193) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
Approval documents
A listed file does not confirm approval. An unlisted file does not establish that an approval is missing or required. Check the documents and their applicability before relying on them.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.
1 K-RERA order on this project (PROJECT EXTENSION) — read the order copies on the K-RERA portal.
K-RERA complaint orders (5 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHASHIDHAR IRAPPA BAGEWADI vs M/S.CASA GRANDE GARDE CITY BUILDERS | We plead to the Hon’ble authority to direct the respondent to provide us the delay compensation by considering our memo of calculations until the handover of the units. | AUTHORITY | 10/11/2025 |
| VIRUPAKSHAPPA IRAPPA BAGEWADI vs M/S.CASA GRANDE GARDEN CITY BUILDERS PVT LTD | We plead to the Hon’ble RERA authority to direct the respondent to provide us the delay compensation by considering our memo of calculations until the handover of the units. | AUTHORITY | 10/11/2025 |
| G THIMMAPPA & PRIYANKA vs CASA GRAND LORENGA | Need action on cheating and fraudulently sold the unit | AUTHORITY | 09/10/2023 |
| SASIDHARAN PREETHI NAIR vs CASA GRANDE LORENZA | Request help to stop harassment from builder and let us live peacefully in our legally obtained house. | AUTHORITY | 05/12/2023 |
| Anjana P vs Casa Grand Lorenza | To reconstruct the demolished wall of my unit DG03, restore all the damages made by the Builder to the fullest satisfaction of mine. Builder should be punished as per Law. Seeking Justice from RERA. | AUTHORITY | 03/05/2024 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (8 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/200816/0006368 16-08-2020 | Delay in Handover of Apartment C204 - CASAGRAND ROYCE Project | Casagrand Royce (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/211201/0008654 01-12-2021 | DELAYED COMPLETION BREACH OF TRUST FINANCIAL LOSSES SUFFERED BY COMPLAINANTS | Casagrand Royce (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/220321/0009178 21-03-2022 | Builder refuses to pay interset for the amount refunded after 4 years | Casagrand Royce (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/220616/0009641 16-06-2022 | Delay In hand over which was expected to be done by 9th of March 2022 | Casagrand Florella (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/220706/0009722 06-07-2022 | Builder not refunding the booking amount due to unavailability of the unit | Casagrand Florella Phase 2 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/221104/0010175 04-11-2022 | Builder not delivering the apartment flat C306 to date even after the expiry of the RERA Extended due date (15th July 2022) and denied to pay delay compensation | Casa Grande Lorenza | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/221107/0010222 07-11-2022 | Builder not delivering the apartment flat C306 to date even after the expiry of the RERA Extended due date (15th July 2022) and denied to pay delay compensation | Casa Grande Lorenza | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/221221/0010496 21-12-2022 | Builder not adhering to the agreed and adding new clause in the sale deed | Casagrand Florella (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 2 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | VIKRAM DESAI | - | 1963 | Palace cross road, Bangalore |
| Structural engineer | Amarnath R. Boraiah | - | - | - |
Builder track record
RERA filingCasagrand has 20 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records — grouped across the several project-specific entities this developer registers under (e.g. this project is filed as “Casa Grande”) (average reported construction progress 41%). 11 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹37.5 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: HDFC Ulsoor. RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 6 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 6 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 14 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 14 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 19 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 19 km |
| Electronic City | 29 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.